SENATOR THE HON. ERIC ABETZ
LIBERAL SENATOR FOR TASMANIA
24th May 2020
Abetz joins international call to protect Hong Kong from communist China
Tasmanian Liberal Senator Eric Abetz has added his weight as a former Senate leader and current Chair of the Senate’s Foreign Affairs Defence and Trade Committee to a list of international signatories calling on the Chinese Communist dictatorship to honour its agreement to protect the freedoms and liberties of the Hong Kongers.
The 201 Parliamentarians and policymakers from 23 different countries around the world (of which Senator Abetz is one) have publicly called on the Chinese Communist dictatorship to honour the Sino-British Joint Declaration which was part of the arrangement of China regaining control of Hong Kong from Britain.
The unilateral introduction of national security legislation in Hong Kong is a fundamental breach of the Declaration and calls into question the Chinese Communist dictatorship’s commitment to stand by its agreements, Senator Abetz said.
This latest action by China is part of a disturbing trend that aims to suppress freedom and exert control over other nations. We must remain vigilant to the increasingly insidious influence that China tries to exert domestically here in Australia (as seen with Victoria’s participation in the Belt and Road Initiative) and on the international stage.
Freedom is fundamental. Advocates for freedom cannot sit idly by as a dictatorship breaches not only widely accepted standards but repudiates an agreement to which it is a signatory.
Having met with pro-democracy representatives from Hong Kong, I have heard firsthand their inspirational and principled commitment to protecting the freedoms which they were promised by China. China needs to honour its commitments if it is in any way concerned about its standing as a keeper of its agreements.
I am heartened so many have signed the statement from diverse countries and political persuasions which indicates the gravity of the breach of commitment by China.
The senator calls on all freedom-loving countries and parliamentarians to add their name to the list and be counted.
The joint statement from 201 Signatories:
We, the co-signed, write to express grave concerns about the unilateral introduction of national security legislation by Beijing in Hong Kong. This is a comprehensive assault on the city’s autonomy, rule of law, and fundamental freedoms. The integrity of one-country, two-systems hangs by a thread. It is the genuine grievances of ordinary Hong Kongers that are driving protests. Draconian laws will only escalate the situation further, jeopardising Hong Kong’s future as an open Chinese international city.
If the international community cannot trust Beijing to keep its word when it comes to Hong Kong, people will be reluctant to take its word on other matters. Sympathetic governments must unite to say that this flagrant breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration cannot be tolerated.
Labor’s growing conga line of apologists for the communist dictatorship in China needs to be brought into line by Labor leader Anthony Albanese according to Tasmanian Liberal Senator Eric Abetz.
Senator Abetz is the Chair of the Senate’s Foreign Affairs Defence and Trade Legislation Committee.
The antics in Victoria yesterday with yet another State Labor minister defending the indefensible and avoiding scrutiny of State Labor’s funny money deal with the Chinese communist dictatorship needs to be unequivocally repudiated by Mr Albanese.
If Mr Albanese wants any credibility as a leader who will put Australia first, he needs to publicly disown and repudiate the ever-growing number of these apologists in his party.
From influential former Premier Bob Carr and former Senator Dastyari in NSW to powerbroker Senator Kim Carr, State Treasurer Tim Pallas and Ministerial colleague Jacinta Allan in Victoria, not to mention Premier Andrew's unconscionable decision to embrace the communist dictatorship’s Belt and Road Initiative, the line is growing by the day. And it needs to be stopped.
The recent kowtowing, grovelling pro-communist China speech by powerbroker Senator Carr in recent times together with the Victorian treasurer's outrageous and unacceptable speech in effect backing China over Australia, over our, and indeed Victoria’s very own barley, exports have been met with a paralysed silence from Anthony Albanese.
These are half a dozen highly influential Labor figures who seem to be more comfortable talking up the Chinese dictatorship’s interests in Australia than they are in promoting their own nation’s interests and its values. All the while Mr Albanese sits quietly by, seemingly impotent to deal with them.
The Australian people are entitled to know where the Leader of the Opposition and his party stand. Do they stand with Australia and its interests or this group of severely misguided, yet influential Labor figures?
Originally published in The Examiner 19th May 2020 (Available here)
The story of Teddy Sheean is the stuff of folk-lore. It will continue to be celebrated, honoured and passed down to future generations with or without a VC. But future generations will be right to ask why and by whom the independent tribunal’s findings recommending a VC for Sheean were rejected.
The rejection of the tribunal’s unanimous recommendation is wrong. Wrong as a matter of process and outcome.
The public advocacy for a VC while well-motivated had the potential to demean the currency of the award. It shouldn’t be a popularity contest. It shouldn’t be determined by the mob. Such a highly regarded award needs to be carefully and soberly considered to protect its currency. Invidious comparisons, details determined and one assumes even confidential records scoured are all part of the process.
Given the public support and campaign for a VC for Teddy Sheean, it was right and proper that the matter was referred to an independent tribunal.
The issue needed to be elevated above a demeaning popularity contest. It was.
We were all therefore duty-bound to respect and accept the decision of the tribunal (irrespective of its finding) unless some egregious fault in procedure or determination could be identified. No such egregious failing has been asserted. Accordingly, the finding needs to be honoured and a posthumous VC awarded to Teddy Sheean.
In 1999 I read into the Senate Hansard the Teddy Sheean story as told in HMAS Armidale – The Ship That Had To Die by F.B Walker:
"Ted Sheean, just 27 days short of his 19th birthday, could see his shipmates were being ripped to bits. His ship was being attacked by Japanese warplanes.
“He was himself unwounded and could have scrambled to some sort of shelter. He could have dived overboard and trusted to luck by duck-diving to escape the bullets.
“He did none of those things. Instead he scrambled back to the Oerlikon gun abaft the bridge, a distance of some 10 difficult and hazardous metres, thrust his shoulders into the semi-circular grips at the rear of the gun and strapped himself in.
“The ship was sinking fast. It was only three minutes since the first torpedo struck until she vanished. The moment Sheean fastened that strap he must have known he would go down with the ship.
“He poured stream after stream of 20mm shells at the strafing Japanese fighters and sent one cartwheeling into the sea. A Zero flashed in, its guns blazing, and slashed Sheean's chest and back wide open.
"With blood pouring from his wounds Sheean kept fighting, forcing some of the Japanese planes to sheer away. The ship was now sinking fast and the water was lapping Sheean's feet but still he kept firing.
“The men in the water gasped in amazement as they saw the bloodstained, desperate youngster wheel his gun from target to target, his powerless legs dragging on the deck.
“Then came the most incredible sight of all. The ship plunged down and the sea rose up past Sheean's waist to his shattered chest. Still he kept firing. As the gun was dragged into the sea its barrel kept recoiling and shots kept pouring from it.
“Even when there was nothing left of the ship above water, tracer bullets from Sheean's gun kept shooting from under the water in forlorn, bizarre arcs."
It was, said author Walker, an act of sublime, selfless heroism.
"It was not the result of years of training and discipline—Sheean had been in the Navy only a few short months," Walker said. "He was not acting on orders. It was his decision and his alone. It was not a question of duty—the order to abandon ship had been given and he was free to try to save his own life.
He chose to try to save the lives of shipmates and to inflict as much damage on the enemy as he could. It was valour above and beyond the call of duty."
More recently I pursued the issue of the release of the tribunal’s funding’s at the last Senate Estimates in February.
It’s not too hard to understand why the tribunal found as it did. What is hard to understand is the decision to reject its findings. One suspects Sheean’s heroism and sacrifice will live on in our folklore a lot longer than those that denied him a VC.
Arguing against protection for religious freedom is exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, given its overwhelming acceptance. Therefore resort is had to outright untruths and gross misrepresentations both of which were littered throughout Mr Croome's contribution along with the all too prevalent sneering and belittling of people of faith.
First, the pandemic rules of social distancing apply to all. The proposed Bill will not alter that for the future in any way shape or form.
Why the contrary is falsely asserted can only be based on gross ignorance or malicious mischief-making. To suggest anyone of faith could or would deny a COVID 19 vaccine injection is fanciful.
Suggesting a doctor of faith would tell a COVID19 patient they are "sinful or bound for Hell" is fanciful on steroids.
But these myths must be pedalled to try to justify the unjustifiable. A sure sign of the desperation of the campaign seeking to deny people this basic human right.
Secondly, the medical personnel in any hospital or aged care facility (faith-based or otherwise) are required to be fully medically qualified for their relevant role. This, of course, will not change.
To falsely suggest they will be chosen on religious belief and not competence has no basis. Newsflash ... you can be both qualified and a person of faith. They are not mutually exclusive.
Thirdly, to bizarrely suggest COVID19 sufferers would get lesser treatment at a Catholic hospital is an ugly throwback to the sectarianism which has thankfully long been discarded by mainstream society especially those who genuinely believe in equality and don't just virtue signal with the title while campaigning for the opposite.
Or to suggest "The people who will suffer most from derogatory and humiliating statements will be those who fall foul of traditional religious beliefs... like people with disability" is perhaps the most ignorant statement out of many.
Centuries ago it was people of faith that created hospitals and cared for the disabled and vulnerable when the rest of society would leave them to suffer and die. It took many years before the governments of the day started to provide this type of support.
The legacy of faith-based charities lives on today as they are amongst the largest providers in the world of healthcare, education and care for those with disabilities.
Fourthly, the derogatory descriptors employed against people of faith such as "more holy", "most pious" and "prejudice" exposes the ugly underbelly of so-called "equality" advocates. They disparagingly seek to divide Australians against people of faith.
"Diversity" was all the rage for the "equality" campaigners at one stage. Now it seems some diverse beliefs are more equal than others.
When an Archbishop can be dragged before a Discrimination Commission for promoting his Church's teachings which was accorded with the law of the land you know there is a defect in our laws - a major defect.
The recent increase in litigation against those expressing their religious beliefs is now becoming an alarming trend that spares no-one, whether you are a professional rugby player, medical worker or a school in Ballarat employing teachers who uphold the school's beliefs.
In the USA, Christian baker Jack Philips' case was taken all the way to the Supreme Court after he refused to bake a cake that supported same-sex marriage. Only last month he has been targeted and sued again, this time for not baking a cake celebrating a "gender transition." There is a clear and urgent need to protect freedom of religion.
Religious freedom is a fundamental human right guaranteed in our common law and more recently enunciated very clearly in a plethora of international human rights treaties. The fact Mr Croome failed to mention either is telling.
The lack of protections for religious freedom has been rightly identified by the Australian Human Rights Commission as a major gap in our laws. The Liberal Government is correctly committed to rectifying this omission in our laws.
A simple reminder to all... the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states very clearly in Article 18: "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion...and...to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance."
Seeking to deny religious freedom is akin to denying freedom of thought and conscience as well. That is why protecting religious freedom actually protects all of us from authoritarian forces.
Opinion piece published in The Examiner, 4 May 2020 (available here).
Captain James Cook's world-class navigational skills changed the world when he landed at Botany Bay in April 1770.
This historic and heroic achievement is worth celebrating even after 250 years. The fact it was not celebrated as it should've been is to be regretted. Not only was it a class act of navigational expertise for the era. It was also a world-changing event.
As our national treasure and pre-eminent historian, Prof Geoffrey Blainey AC said: Captain Cook
"...indirectly made possible present-day Australia which, despite its many failures, is surely one of the success stories of the world."
Australia as a modern nation 250 years after Cook's magnificent discovery stands amongst the best, if not the best, in the world. Blessed with a civil society, a democratic constitutional monarchy, rule of law, personal freedoms, peace, and comparative wealth untold, we are home to a nation full of people from the four corners of the world living in harmony. It's no secret we are the envy of the world. And for good reason. Their judgement and assessment of us as a people and a country of opportunity is not wrong.
Cook and his crew would never have been able to imagine what their discovery would usher in. For his time Captain Cook's advancement through the ranks was an exception as he came from humble beginnings working on the ships delivering coal from Yorkshire to London. His sheer capacity and personal skills allowed him to advance and be the quite rightly celebrated hero navigator of his era. His achievements based on the opportunities afforded him based on merit is worthy of celebration and passing down to the next and following generations.
Failing to pass on the history of this giant and his integral involvement in the establishment of modern Australia is to do not only Captain Cook and his crew a disservice but an especially huge disservice to our children who are entitled to know the history of their nation.
And let's remember, Captain Cook set out on a voyage of scientific and geographic exploration - not invasion. He was a man of his time, not ours. As such his legacy must be viewed in that context.
We should never reduce our nation's great history to a narrow grievance fault-finding focus. Our history, like that of every country (and indeed every individual), has its unattractive elements. But these elements should never be allowed to define our national narrative given we and our forebears have achieved so much.
As predictable as night follows day so there are the few who seek to shroud the Cook achievements in darkness with a smattering of alleged negative missteps. In doing so they very capably look past the log in their own eye to identify a speck (real or more likely imaginary) in Cook's. The one imponderable question the naysayers will never dare to ask, let alone answer is: But for the Cook discovery and English settlement what would've been the destiny of this great south land?
The meeting and indeed clash of cultures 250 years ago can't be undone. While a few busy themselves feverishly finding fault with our past, true leaders busy themselves building for the future.
As a migrant from a non-English speaking background, I for one am thankful for Cook and his legacy. It should be celebrated. So from me at least, a big thank you to Captain James Cook and his crew. Your legacy lives on in the foundations of the best country in the world.
Likening COVID-19 to the heroic and historic arrival of Captain Cook in 1770 by Victoria’s Deputy Chief Health Officer has been dismissed as ill-informed, ill-timed and terribly ill-advised by Tasmanian Liberal Senator Eric Abetz.
“The Deputy Chief Health Officer might do well to learn from the relevant experts in the field like Professor Geoffrey Blainey AC before she foolishly wallows into disciplines of which she clearly has no understanding,” Senator Abetz said.
“I’m sure her medical expertise is exceptional. Her attempt in the discipline of history would be hysterical if she didn’t expect to be treated seriously. This tortured, non-relevant attempted analogy may enhance her “wokeness” credentials amongst the few but will leave the vast majority of Australians demanding a focus by her on the urgent task at hand,” he continued.
“She should delete the tweet and stick to the task at hand,” Senator Abetz concluded.
SENATOR THE HON. ERIC ABETZ
LIBERAL SENATOR FOR TASMANIA
27th April 2020
Abetz downloads Coronavirus Contact App
Tasmanian Liberal Senator Eric Abetz has downloaded the Coronavirus Contact App after careful consideration and being satisfied with the extensive privacy safeguards.
“Whilst expressing my instinctive reluctance to accept government monitoring devices I’ve been persuaded on balance that the protections are so strong and the monitoring so minimal that the app’s design is a well-constructed, balanced response to the pandemic.
“What is more, this tool will enable us to resume normal activities more quickly than otherwise.
“Having a strong commitment to small government with limited interference in our daily lives I was initially concerned about the prospects of a monitoring app. But given the voluntary nature of the app, the capacity to delete the app at any time, its automatic deletion of data after 21 days and the exceptionally restricted access to its information I am convinced it will be a worthwhile tool to assist our monitoring of the virus and our return to a normal lifestyle.
“The conclusion I’ve come to is an ‘on balance’ decision and I believe it to be in all our individual and national interests. I encourage all Tasmanians to download the app – it is highly protected from a privacy point of view and has the capacity to save lives, jobs and our economy by potentially ushering in an earlier lifting of the current restrictions.”
Opinion piece published in The Examiner, 21 April 2020 (available here).
Life is certainly different. Jarringly different.
So too, will Anzac Day 2020 be different. Very different.
No marches, no parades, no dawn services, no mingling for a coffee or community breakfast afterwards, or a few beers at the RSL or pub.
Nevertheless, we can and should commemorate our veteran community, especially the over 102,000 of our fellow Australians that made the ultimate selfless sacrifice for our benefit.
We can all do the right thing by tuning in at 5.30 am on Anzac Day to The Australian War Memorial's nationally broadcast service which will be available on ABC TV, ABC Radio, Facebook and iView. Let's all make the effort to set our alarms to honour our defence personnel and watch the service.
After which we can participate in one minute's silence at either 6 am or 11.30 am if not both. There will also be a special Tasmanian commemorative service broadcast at 11.30 am on ABC Northern Tasmania.
While the social side of Anzac Day is denied us this year it affords us the opportunity to engage in some deeper introspection reminding ourselves of the selfless bravery and commitment to our future to which our defence personnel dedicated their service.
They believed it was worthwhile to commit in as serious manner as is possible to the protection and defence of the virtues that underpin our society and which we all too often take as a given. Virtues such as our freedoms to speak and worship and to own property.
The virtues of democracy, the rule of law, and a civilised society. Regrettably, a very few still suggest that commemorating Anzac Day is a glorification of war. This is simply untrue. It would be like suggesting Easter is a glorification of crucifixions. If that is your view you've completely lost the plot.
At Easter, we celebrate the selfless sacrifice of our Lord that we might have the blessing of eternal life. Similarly, with Anzac Day we commemorate the selfless sacrifice by our defence personnel that enables us to live in freedom and in a civilised society.
Thankfully the Anzac Day detractors are diminishing in number as the numbers at dawn services swell to record levels with the attendance of younger people.
In Tasmania, we have 10,500 war veterans and ex-service personnel. Our gratitude can be expressed by participating in commemorations and also in our day to day activities with each other in our families, workplaces and society at large asking how we can be of service.
We have many people already living such a life of service. The Headstone Project which provides headstones to the unmarked graves of our WW1 veterans, Legacy, the RSL'S, and those pursuing a VC for our very own Teddy Sheean.
Not everyone is suited to our military but everyone is suited to making a contribution to our fellow Australians through community organisations. This would be a great way for us to show we have not forgotten the service of our veterans.
Lest we forget.
The latest announcement from the Chinese Communist Party regarding the restrictions on academics publishing information on the origins of the coronavirus is a dangerous move that not only threatens the world’s ability to fight the coronavirus but requires a deep re-examination of our academic collaboration with China.
Opinion piece published in The Examiner, 6 April 2020 (available here).
“When the going gets tough, the tough get going.”
This wise old saying has been lived out by our forefathers in our community for centuries during droughts, floods, wars, and depression. And it’s being lived out again by most of us in 2020 as we face the coronavirus and its impact.
Lives cut short, liberties curtailed, jobs destroyed, retirements shattered, livelihoods and plans marooned, and economies demolished are just some of the stark realities we face.
The far-reaching and exceptional consequences for the lives of our fellow Australians have been brought home by the legion of inquiries I’ve received this past fortnight.
Issues ranging in no particular order:
- How to bring home loved ones from the four corners of the world;
- How to apply for the support provisioned through the taxpayer;
- How to iron out anomalies;
- How the working holiday visa holder left without a job is to fare;
- How to conduct church services;
- What is an essential job/business;
- Can counselling still take place?
- And spare a thought for the couple who were contractually bound to vacate (through sale) their house in Victoria but had not yet settled their purchase in Legana and so were denied entry to Tasmania because they weren’t residents (all now thankfully resolved).
In these tough times, we need to draw on our own reserves of resilience and goodwill to ensure we remain individually and socially civil. We need to encourage each other in these behaviours as well.
The overwhelming feedback received by my office is the acceptance, indeed a willing and deliberate rising to the occasion, that we are all in this together. So patience, courtesies and compliance with requests from authorities are all being exercised along with the requisite physical distancing.
My odd morning jog sees fellow joggers/walkers taking wide berths from each other with a compensating big smile and greeting. Community at its best – staying distant yet friendly.
While it seems we are in this for the long haul, it is vital we continue to exercise civilities and do our bit. And remember we are going through this to help protect the lives of the physically vulnerable. Every life matters. Each one of us counts.
And then, when we emerge on the other side with our full liberties restored we will all nevertheless need to retain this Team Australia approach as we pay down the huge debt burden, restore jobs and the economy, whilst also ensuring we rebuild sufficient resilience in the event of (God forbid) another pandemic or worse. To achieve this for ourselves, our families and our Nation we will need to re-embrace some old, yet tried and tested virtues – such as self-reliance, putting aside for a rainy day, shunning the entitlement mentality be it in payment of taxes owed or claiming welfare, and not putting all our eggs in the one basket to mention a few.
Talking of eggs and baskets… happy Easter and let's revive ourselves spiritually in this season of hope and renewal and bring those qualities to bear now (hope) and when we emerge on the other side (renewal).